What was a significant consequence of Roosevelt's "Big Stick" policy in Latin America?

The "Big Stick" policy, associated with Theodore Roosevelt's presidency, emphasized a strong military presence as a means of achieving U.S. diplomatic goals in Latin America. The phrase "speak softly and carry a big stick" encapsulates this approach, suggesting that the U.S. should engage in diplomatic negotiations but be prepared to use military force if necessary.

One significant consequence of this policy was military intervention in various Latin American countries. For instance, under this policy, the U.S. intervened in the Dominican Republic and Nicaragua to stabilize those nations and ensure favorable conditions for American interests. These interventions were often justified as efforts to maintain order and protect U.S. economic investments.

While other options mention aspects like cultural exchange, democracy, and free trade, they do not directly align with the more militaristic and interventionist approach that characterized Roosevelt's strategy in the region. Instead, the "Big Stick" policy primarily led to a pattern of intervention rather than promoting self-determination or expansive trade agreements. Thus, military intervention stands out as the most significant and direct consequence of this approach in Latin America.